Talk:Ride to Happiness by Tomorrowland

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ride to Happiness by Tomorrowland article.
Please click here to start a new topic, or reply to an existing comment below.

Final inversion

The final inversion of "The Ride to Happiness by Tomorrowland" seems to be a big debate everywhere, Mack calls it a "doule inverting dive loop" and coasterpedia used to call it a Maxx dive loop. rcdb didnt name those final 2 inversions at all, but has since been updates to call in an "Step-Up Under Flip". Whatever it is, this would mean only 4 of the 5 inversions are covered, so i think its time to really decide what this is.

-QDude24

To me, both inversions look similar to the Maxx dive loop, or a zero-g roll merged with a dive loop? Am happy to keep the "Maxx dive loop" element around in order to describe this coaster too. Lachlan (Talk | contribs) 12:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

It appears Mack call this a "Double inverting dive loop", so I think renaming Maxx dive loop to Double inverting dive loop is the best way to do this. Lachlan (Talk | contribs) 13:06, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

That would work, and Maxx force should be updated to have one more inversion in that case, since the Maxx dive loop was considered as 1 inversion, but the double inverting dive loop is, well, double inverting. Mack made the term, but S&S did it first QDude24 (talk) 13:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Great, thanks for this. As for number of inversions, they both look like two to me. But let's leave that debate for another day! Lachlan (Talk | contribs) 13:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

"by Tomorrowland"

When visiting Plopsaland I noticed the "by Tomorrowland" branding was rather subtle and was thinking whether we should drop it from our title as we have tended to omit simple sponserships in the past. I then went on RCDB and noticed they no longer list "by Tomorrowland". I propose we drop it too. Lachlan (Talk | contribs) 13:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)